But anyway, I don't think I need to bother going into any background information on Tragedy at this point, but I have to say, even as one who can wholly understand and respect their principled disregard for most forms of commerce as related to the band, holy shit can it be frustrating trying to find information about these cats when they've got new material out! I mean, shit, a couple of weeks ago when I first heard about their self-released third full-length (entirely at random via email, mind you), I couldn't find one distro that was carrying copies. I also couldn't figure out the name of the record, had no idea how long it had been out, had no idea what formats it was available on, etc. Hell, someone even told me the other day that they saw the band perform fairly recently and they weren't even selling copies at the show!?
Luckily I was able to track down a copy not long ago, and it seems to be filtering out to more and more sources at this point, so... what's the verdict? For me personally, perhaps the most interesting aspect of "Nerve Damage" as a whole is that the opening salvo of the first track, "Eyes of Madness", is complete and total Bolt Thrower worship on every level. But don't get the wrong idea, while little snippets of metal have played a significant role in much of these guys' material since long before Tragedy even formed, this album is about what you'd expect in terms of cranking out 11 tracks of the melodically aggressive socio-political hardcore/punk for which Tragedy has become synonymous.
Is it a rehash of past efforts? No, I wouldn't say that at all. The recording seems to balance the thicker punch of "Vengeance" with the rawer grit of the band's debut quite perfectly, while the songwriting is similar though more diverse in terms of branching out into just a handful of additional riffing styles/tempo variations beyond those driving power chord rhythms and their dissonant accoutrements. In a few instances I'd say the material is barely more melodic and perhaps has more of an energetic burst to its attack, whereas a few of the tunes actually strike me as somewhat darker than Tragedy's past efforts—for example the chilling piano that lays the foundation for the untitled instrumental that separates the two halves of the album.
It seems to take a little growing time to achieve its full effect for some reason, but as usual I'm more than pleased, and Tragedy is certainly the best out there at what they do—practically embarrassing most any band that has dared attempt to recreate this unique niche of hardcore/punk that Tragedy has assimilated and refined from decades of past influences. Excellent, of course.
Tragedy "Eyes of Madness"
Tragedy "Under the Radar"
Sick lyrics as well:
I'm no bastard's slave scarred at birth, bloodstained. Never sold, thrown away. On the surface we appear to comply only because that makes us harder to detect...
Oh, the irony of using the dreaded technological means to promote a band that's neither fond of technology nor the least bit interested in promoting themselves... but what can I say, I'm just a lazy complacent fuck, I guess. I like music and I buy records... and I think you should, too:
Comments
thank you so much!
6.6.2006 | By Anonymous
I agree with your comments about diversity and the fact that their influences are apparent. In Formation has a HHIG sound while the next song, Incendiary, has a guitar solo a la Paintbox or something. The variety keeps things fresh, and the second side of this album is awesome stuff. Still better than any contemporary band they could be compared to.
6.6.2006 | By davehazard
I had the same problem hearing about this. A friend started talking to me about it at a show, and I didn’t believe him for a minute straight. I’m definitely picking this up soon. Thanks!
6.6.2006 | By Jim
1. That Tragedy stuff is unreal. There should also be a rule that every album of every genre must include an air raid siren somewhere. I don’t care if it’s Disfear or Placido Domingo, it improves anything tenfold.
2. That essay about false metal is one of the most OCD/insane things I’ve ever read. I guess when we all rhetorically ask “But who really cares that much” we now have an answer.
6.6.2006 | By Johnny
The show in Albuquerque got shut down by the cops and Tragedy didn’t even get to play. We did, however, get to rummage through their merch so luckily I got to up a Nerve Damage LP.
Please review that new None More Black album. It’s sooooo good. I’d like to hear your thoughts on it.
6.6.2006 | By Joaquín
Joaquín, sadly I was pretty let down by the new None More Black. It’s not a bad record, but it’s sort of boring, and I don’t like it anywhere near as much as their first full-length. It’s just not very memorable or energetic at all. I actually found that new Crime in Stereo to suffer from the same problem - I liked that EP I covered awhile back a lot more than the full-length for some reason. I bought both of those records on the same day and ended up feeling like I had sort of wasted $30!
6.7.2006 | By Andrew Aversionline
Great post Andrew. Not much needs to be said about Tragedy, other than I enjoy how they have streamlined their sound (Vengance was a bit long for their style in my view) and started to incorporate some variations in the compositions.
The Burns article was particularly interesting. I think he’s generally got a good take on the whole hipster/retro metal movement. My main concern though is that he’s arguing about the lack of authenticity in these bands, but really doesn’t explain what constitutes “true” or authentic metal or how bands get recognized as authentic. It seems we take the idea of x or y sound as authentic without really thinking about how the “scene” or fans arrive at those conclusions. Hopefully he’ll follow this piece up with another essay that focuses on the authenticity question.
6.7.2006 | By Howard
I can’t not be a Dave Burns fan because he’s a troublemaker without being an asshole, and he really tries to back up what he says. But I’ve posted around in a few places that I just wish the guy would write in a little more of a talkative manner that would be reader-friendly and more entertaining. The older I get the less I can really get fired up about shit like that though, but I still find it very interesting. I’m torn on the hipster metal thing especially because on the one hand it does disgust me and I hate it, but that’s also because most of those bands blow ass. But there are a few of them that are actually good bands, so it’s like… oh well, I guess!? Ha…
6.7.2006 | By Andrew Aversionline
Yeah, but couple of his points were just way off base. For one, the “hipster acceptance of High on Fire.” For one, who gives a flip who else likes a band? This reminds me of this dork on the old PE boards a few years ago who despised Motorhead only because they had right wing fans. For another, many of those hipsters were huge, HUGE, into SLEEP during the 90’s, so why wouldn’t they be into Pike’s next band? I don’t think he’s around or understands indie, or what he calls “hipster” (which I take to mean non-landscaper looking people to him) culture enough to really criticize it as much as he does.
6.7.2006 | By Johnny
“but really doesn’t explain what constitutes “true” or authentic metal or how bands get recognized as authentic.”
http://www.lotfp.com/content.php?editorialid=1
6.7.2006 | By heh
had the oppty. so see Tragedy at CB’s couple of weeks ago…one of the best bands i’ve seen live in a long time.
6.8.2006 | By hil
Johnny: ‘Surrounded by thieves’ was an extreme disapointment, it seemed like High on Fire was catering to their new-audience, hipsters who did not want to be offended, the production sucked tottaly, way too clean, also add the disgusting rerelease cover of ‘The Art of Self Defence’ (a stoner eagle, and big stoner lettering, wow Man) added with unnessary additional tracks, fanbase does matter, Matt Pike and Co catered to thier immature unmetal teenage hippy audience with disasterous results. I have not even listened to their newer one. Kill “stonerrockers”!
6.10.2006 | By Skcusmsinoiz
Ohhh man. It took a couple of listens to grow on me, but I really love the new None More Black. I was never a huge fan of Crime In Stereo and I haven’t listened to the new album much, but it wasn’t too exciting. The LP for the new NMB is going to double as a board game! I’m pretty excited to pick it up.
6.21.2006 | By Joaquín
Billy’s vocals blow as always. Perhaps in an alteranate reality ,that is sans Billy, I actually dig Tragedy. HHIG still buries almost anything out there.
6.23.2006 | By Anonymous
Dave Burns, metal’s very own David Duke ;o)
7.10.2006 | By Anonymous